the contrast ratio and response times are much better on the cheaper model....16ms response time on the "vista certified" one is unacceptable for gaming.
"vista certified" is just a name...don't pay extra for that.
also, i'd recommend a higher resolution than 1366x768...it's pretty low...personally i'd go with either a smaller monitor with a way higher resolution or this 46" viewsonic with full 1080p for $2399:
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16824116111
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
"vista certified" LCD worth $1000 xtra?
Collapse
X
-
Rajinn repliedmore expensive one comes with feet o.0 some really good feet look at those things !
Leave a comment:
-
TPSFan repliedThe "Vista Certified" one also has a response time of 16ms!
I don't know if that is normal for a 30"+, but for games and full-motion video (HD Movies) on most LCDs you want a maximum of 8ms -- Preferably 5-2ms (BTB) if you can get it.
Leave a comment:
-
Trailboss3 repliedOriginally posted by Secundus View PostSo you get LESS for more money??
Leave a comment:
-
Giggity repliedNo built-in speakers on the expensive one.... Which is a good thing.
Leave a comment:
-
DaUff started a topic "vista certified" LCD worth $1000 xtra?"vista certified" LCD worth $1000 xtra?
Hello,
Can anyone tell me wth the difference between these two monitors is.
http://tinyurl.com/2dywa9
Looks like one has DVI and is "Vista Certified" (whatever that means). However, the vista certified one is $900 more.
Also, if anyone has a suggestions for a good large monitor, I'd be interested. (30" plus)
Uff-DaTags: None
Leave a comment: