Ok... dunno if its asked before, but all this talk about it got me want to know...
So... do you use antialias sampling?
So... do you use antialias sampling?
-
-
Slow down the FPS too much. I can live with jaggies. -
I used to run AA at 4x, but now I put it down to 2x to give me more FPS and I put AF on 16x.Comment
-
I use 4x, but that's cause my racing sims at the moment are more important to me than UT2k4 and I can't race with jaggies.Comment
-
Single player games where I want top graphics:
4xAA 4xAF
Multiplayer games like UT2k3/4:
2xAA 2xAF
Unfortunately after having tried out anti-aliasing, I can't go back to horrible looking jagged edges anymore. 2x Anti Aliasing provides the best performance/graphics ratio for me.Comment
-
I use 6x
ATI Radeom 9700 pro
Athlon 2800
1024 ramComment
-
Don't touch the thing. If I could somehow set AA on something like 0.00000001, my FPS would still crash into negative figures.
meh, if I want a fuzzy, blurry gaming experience i'll buy an N64.Comment
-
high res > AA
AF is da bomb tho!
(can't use it tho, too heavy on my ti4600)Comment
-
4x
Comment
-
Yes. Yes I do. My 9800 pro luvs it too.Comment
-
If you stare at the screen with all the nice textures and effects and notice small jaggies, you aren't playing the game. I won't even turn AA on when I get me a new card in a month or so.Comment
-
Nah. On older games I use high resolution instead and my Radeon 9600 (NP) can't handle newer games with high resolution/antialias.
Comment
-
In UT2k4, no. The action is too fast for me to notice the effect, aside from the slowdown it causes.Comment
-
I like my game to look goodOriginally posted by sandmanfvr
If you stare at the screen with all the nice textures and effects and notice small jaggies, you aren't playing the game. I won't even turn AA on when I get me a new card in a month or so.
If you are getting 50+ fps, why not?
Comment
-
1600x1200 > FSAAComment
Comment