When I'm playing UT2004 I have the fps pegged at 85 even, because of vsync. When I play back a demo, it barely goes to 50. What's the problem? It's making fraps record at like 20fps and everything's all slow and choppy.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Demo Playback and Fraps
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Hentai.incWhen I'm playing UT2004 I have the fps pegged at 85 even, because of vsync. When I play back a demo, it barely goes to 50. What's the problem? It's making fraps record at like 20fps and everything's all slow and choppy.
-
look at www.own-age.com and www.ninjagaz.com for some UT moviemaking tut's
or use the searchfunction on this forum and look for dumpframes, because quality, encoding and playubackspeedwise its way superior to fraps.
you probably have too high leveldetail on btw. fraps asks a LOT from your pc when your capturing (writes away a few gig in a few seconds basically) and that + rendering UT2k4 @ high detail is just too much to go highfps.
Comment
-
Originally posted by EchohawkCheck to see what settings for fps Fraps is on. You seriously should just use Dumpframes and VirtualDub if you want good results when recording however.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Sphinxpretty much basic virtualdub work which takes you 3 tries and you'll have the hang of it.
Comment
-
Originally posted by BersyI know how to do it in virtualdub (psst, it would be even easier in vegas), doesn't change the fact that it's a waste of time to have to cap the audio seperately from the video. another thing that makes fraps superior is you don't have to create a lot of unnecessary video just to get the clips you want.. punching in and out with a hotkey is as easy as it gets.
Comment
-
Nobody said anything about less work. Less time wasted on one aspect, yes. My Fraps/Vegas videos turn out better quality than plenty of ones I've seen done in Virtualdub with dumpframes. It isn't just the program you use, it is the skill level of the person using it as well. And for me, I'd rather save some time by cutting out trivial tasks, thus enabling me to spend more time making the quality up to par. That's not lazy - it's smart.
Comment
-
Originally posted by BersyNobody said anything about less work. Less time wasted on one aspect, yes. My Fraps/Vegas videos turn out better quality than plenty of ones I've seen done in Virtualdub with dumpframes. It isn't just the program you use, it is the skill level of the person using it as well. And for me, I'd rather save some time by cutting out trivial tasks, thus enabling me to spend more time making the quality up to par. That's not lazy - it's smart.
Comment
-
Originally posted by [NBS]FlakRecord at 640x480 Res, if you're not already. Dumpframes is great for an artsy movie, but it takes a lot of time and a lot of processing power. Fraps is fine for your average frag movie.
imho for a movie to show off your skills i would not recommend fraps, but if it's just an fun movie then i can say ok.... :bulb:
Comment
-
Originally posted by SphinxNobody said anything about appending a movie in virtualdub either, if you want a quality endresult i'd still recommend adobe premiere over vegas in a flash of a second. I talked about just synching audio with a clip recorded with dumpframes in virtualdub, to edit with premiere and/or after effects afterwards. Thats just 2 minutes of work, and gives you better quality, more fluent movement and better editabillity. I have made several UT movies with smiley (eventhough he did 90% of the editingwork since he's a god with that, that doesnt leave me retarded about it) and we used both dumpframes as fraps, and just trust me on this, after 7 full length movies you kinda found out what works best. And again, it feels weird that you tell me its about the skill-level of the person using it, which is quite an insult to me, and i try to let that statement come out as un-cocky as possible. But i know my stuff, would guess you would too.
true
Comment
Comment