So you fixed the gem forging, did you, chair?

[Silversabeast]

NO YOU DIDN'T. first of all, it is incredibly overpriced now.

second, you said that it would fix gem forging so you would always get a better gem than you put in. well guess what? I forged a +60%, a +29%, and a +25% XP gems together, and what do I get? a +56% XP gem. really? not only do you destroy gem forging in way of cost, but in way of value too.

[Previon]

I couldn't agree more

[vettigeherder]

Amen to that, I hope they regain their senses and fix it in the next update...

[tristantzara]

/agree_____________________________

[Thunderblow]

Right on!
Chair, you ruined the your gem forging concept!

[grantnoe]

Yeah that's pretty great when you put several million into gems and then get a couple thousand out...

[=Silver=]

Did they fixed CM login?
Is there a reason to upgrade? Thanks I didn't yet...

[Silversabeast]

Did they fixed CM login?
Is there a reason to upgrade? Thanks I didn't yet...

No reason whatsoever. I never had any problems with 1.1 CM. I have noticed a little more stability in 1.1.1, but still not worth it

[grantnoe]

Did they fixed CM login?
Is there a reason to upgrade? Thanks I didn't yet...

The ONE and ONLY reason anybody should want to upgrade is for the rainbow gem. But that's all really.

[kabeshis1923]

NO YOU DIDN'T. first of all, it is incredibly overpriced now.

second, you said that it would fix gem forging so you would always get a better gem than you put in. well guess what? I forged a +60%, a +29%, and a +25% XP gems together, and what do I get? a +56% XP gem. really? not only do you destroy gem forging in way of cost, but in way of value too.

if you look it in a different view, it did yield a better gem, why? you forged in a 25% and 29% gem that is pretty low with a gem that is high 60%. it is possible that forging uses "averages" and "dilution" of the stats of gem.

[mammoth]

if you look it in a different view, it did yield a better gem, why? you forged in a 25% and 29% gem that is pretty low with a gem that is high 60%. it is possible that forging uses "averages" and "dilution" of the stats of gem.

No, it makes absolutely no sense. The forged gem must be better than the best of the three gems. Otherwise there is no point in forging. If you keep on taking averages, your forge would never progrress. Why would anyone want to sacrifice a top gem so that it could get "averaged out" by two lame gems?

[MPLewis]

No, it makes absolutely no sense. The forged gem must be better than the best of the three gems. Otherwise there is no point in forging. If you keep on taking averages, your forge would never progrress. Why would anyone want to sacrifice a top gem so that it could get "averaged out" by two lame gems?

It means that you have to be smart about your forging. Granted, I dislike losing stats on my high-end gems when I forge incorrectly, but it wouldn't be fair if you could throw two Attack +1s with a high end attack gem and get something better. Then the really high-level gems would be way too easy to come by. You have to work at building up other lower stat gems to match your high ones before you forge. Makes gem forging a little bit tougher and more of an art.

[nwcs]

Yeah, it's been pretty disappointing with the update. Just experimented with a 45, 5, and 15 health. Ended up with a 45 health...

[Silversabeast]

It means that you have to be smart about your forging. Granted, I dislike losing stats on my high-end gems when I forge incorrectly, but it wouldn't be fair if you could throw two Attack +1s with a high end attack gem and get something better. Then the really high-level gems would be way too easy to come by. You have to work at building up other lower stat gems to match your high ones before you forge. Makes gem forging a little bit tougher and more of an art.

yes but they said that you would ALWAYS get a better gem than you put in. this is what one of the representatives said:

Updated 5/2/2012: The ClashMob update is now live. Be sure to check it out and let us know what you think!



Hey everyone, I want to let everyone know that the team has submitted an update that will address some of the issues you've reported thus far in the ClashMob beta. Below is a list of what's contained in the update. Since the submission process does take some time, I don't have an ETA to share with you at this point. As soon as we have an idea when it will be ready, we'll let you know!

We're continuing to read all of your feedback so please keep telling us what you think. Thanks for all of your support in the ClashMob beta!



- Fixed a bug preventing some people from claiming ClashMob rewards. This won't re-award the old ones, but will allow you to claim future rewards. (If there are some you missed, let us know what you’d like to see as we’re always adding new events!)

- Fixed a bug that made it so you had to restart the game sometimes to see new ClashMob events.

- The % complete on a ClashMob event should no longer show negative numbers.

- Made improvements to ClashMob servers.

- The Gem Forge works better, always giving you a better gem than the ones you put in.

look at the last improvement...

[timmy1114]

Way to leave the gem forging broken cHair

[renan976]

kabeshis1923 you've just said what I was going to say. adding 25 + 29 + 60 = 114, and divide it by 2 you'll get 57. So, you're going to receive an exp gem around this value.

[Rainbow Seeker]

If this raised cost is permanent, the least they could do is tell us that they were raising the cost.

[aenimis]

Just as a heads up they did not fix CM. I still have to restart the app in order to see new events and even reset the event timer to display correctly which i did not have a problem with before the update. And I agree with you Rainbow seeker. A warning would have been much appreciated. I hate underhanded tactics like that.