
Originally Posted by
SKORGE
Contrary to the name, I like the Theron-class more than the Kantus.
However, hands down in a battle that requires speed and movement, Skorge will defeat RAAM 9/10 times. RAAM may have a Troika, but its a little hard to use when you're being killed by a deadly ink cloud, also taking away your sight. Sure, RAAM has the Kryll, but again, Skorge would have the Riftworm, no? If we use weapon vs weapon and stat vs stat, RAAM is at a disadvantage in most scenarios. Skorge is literally like an AT-mine, where as RAAM is the tank. The Kyrll would also scatter if they were to come in contact with Tickers.
Just saying, most people love RAAM but they refuse to actually put his tactics to work in reasonable stratagies. If we do so, RAAM actually has little going for him. Now, if it was a one-on-one fist-fight, I'd give the edge to RAAM. You also have to remember, Kim was about to take out RAAM before Barrack stopped him. That coat isn't chainsaw-proof, its leather. The only reason it would take awhile is because of the mass amount of skin on RAAM. The Locust skin is like a thick hide, meaning, double the leather for the blades to cut through. Still, Kim would have killed RAAM right then and there.
Lets not forget that if RAAM were not to have the Kryll or Troika, he would have a small dagger up against a double-staffed chainsaw. The staff has a longer range, meaning, RAAM would have to get in close (and Skorge is all about CQC) to do damage. Realisitically, the battle just wouldn't work with any sort of equipment for both of them, because it heavily favors Skorge's speed and agility as well as range. In order for RAAM to destroy Skorge, he needs to fight him without weapons, hand-to-hand. If that were the case, RAAM would defeat Skorge easily.
Bookmarks