bombing run poll

[~uXc~Twi$T3d]

bombing run rock's

[icewind]

Bombing run sucks.

[Wormbo]

It doesn't suck, but ditch it anyway. Fans won't have to worry, modders will add it back in.
Let Epic concentrate on fewer gametypes. Quality is more important than quantity.

[blackout]

bobing run suck's as much as your spelling doe's

[SlowDrag]

BR is great, really great. The problem with it is only that the stock maps are not suitable for such a mod. Also, some rules should be modified.

The BR maps should be open, arena style, with no place to hide. All players should be able to see where the ball is all the time. BR-Thorns is the perfect example of a good BR map.

The ball carrier should be able to defend himself, just like the flag carrier.

The only way to score should be by carriyng the ball in the goal, not throwing it in.

Finally, the translocator should be removed by default.

[AntiMatter]

Ditch It !

[NUTS!]

BR-Thorns is the perfect example of a good BR map..

Any map with "thorns' or 'barn' in the name automatically constitutes it a terrible map. You also probably think it should be low-grav 135% speed and with the ESR rifle aswell.


I personally think BR is fine as it is.

[Scylla]

There's already three threads about bombing run...

[SlowDrag]

Nuts should shut it up instead of filling up this thread with sarcasms. Gee...

[fuegerstef]

I am with Wormbo right here...

[Xyx]

We agree!

[Adhesion]

ditch it. For UT2007 they seriously need to pull of a miracle. Now is not the time for including unecessary gametypes that will help segregate the community on launch.

As someone already said, leave it to the modders. Besides, Deathball > Bombing Run.

[Ward]

I liked Bombing Run, really, but I'm not going to miss it.

[Sero]

I voted keep it because I think it's one of the better gametypes, but I guess it wouldn't matter much. I hardly get to play it in a game that does have it, so perhaps it's just the best to leave it out.

[_Cox]

Whatever!
How about that option?

[Jrubzjeknf]

/with Wormbo as well

[oceaN[nova]]

I _only_ played Bombing Run back in UT2003, but UT2004 has killed it. Ditch it. The less gametypes the better, because there's all these communities within the community, which sucks.

[MonsOlympus]

Its funny how the split in the community thing comes up with team gametypes. Im primarily a dm gamer but that doesnt stop me playing team gametypes. I think its the whole pro attitude of online gaming thats the problem not the amount of gametypes, if people would be more open and actually play more than just ctf or tdm it might actually work. Not saying br doesnt have problems, like any gametype does, its just I think if competative ladders were more mixed up gametype wise then there wouldnt be the excuse of the split in the community. Everyone will play atleast one gametype they dont like in there life I dont see why this should be any different, mix it up with dm's with clan leaders, tdm's which determine the next ctf match etc

[happycat]

Bombing Run was awesome back when CliffyB said he wanted to call it Deathball.

[-VT-]

seeing as how epic has already said no to BR (quite some time ago too) this poll really is meaningless...but i went ahead and said ditch it. Modders will put it back in if there is a demand for it (and there is). In other words, epic can concentrate on making really good DM/TDM/1on1, CTF/vCTF, Onslaught, Warfare maps while the community can make it's own BR maps...so in the end everybody wins