[IMG] http://www.fh-worms.de/~inf650/pics/photoshop.jpg[/IMG]
I dont know why people wank over magazines like FHM or Maxim, they are really masterbating over graphic wizardy
[IMG] http://www.fh-worms.de/~inf650/pics/photoshop.jpg[/IMG]
I dont know why people wank over magazines like FHM or Maxim, they are really masterbating over graphic wizardy
photoshop pwnage![]()
Of course, that's just my opinion. I could be wrong.
that is freaky
Hmm... yep, Photoshops ownz.
Though the first example is probably a better example of how someone can be made to look prettier (the end result isn't even thát pretty IMO), while the other two posted by Mr. Brownstone show more of age.
The second one in that post, I actually like the original picture better. The other looks... American.![]()
That´s a lot different,still its not.
Ok edited out a bad joke in the post.![]()
holy crap
woah![]()
Ick.
| Weird.... |
Mr. Brownstone's links are interesting..
What? What's with mr. Brownstone's link?... I was traumatized about a year ago when I was tricked into seeing a picture of a dead person online, since then I've been somewhat paranoid about any link I am about to open.
Ya, but you still need someone/ or you should still use some one that has somthing to work with.......Originally posted by |SigH|Max
Mr. Brownstone's links are interesting..Im not that big into comertialy advertized people........even though my brother modeled through out college....ime not braging by saying that because ime not that close to him....but.....it would be easyer to use.......
![]()
Than.........
If you want to see some funny photo shoping..... http://www.poddys.com/jokes/cart_337.htm![]()
They both link to a professional retoucher's homepage (I think that's what he is).Originally posted by Last-Words
What? What's with mr. Brownstone's link?... I was traumatized about a year ago when I was tricked into seeing a picture of a dead person online, since then I've been somewhat paranoid about any link I am about to open.
The first goes to a girl in a bikini, when you roll the mouse over it you get to see the original picture. (which is of a woman at least 10 or 20 years older)
The second is of a blonde girl with a perfectly smooth skin. The original also looks a lot older (and 1000 times more realistic).
It's nothing shocking.
LOL, It was like watch the boob get bigger, and the wrinkle get smaller:haha::up:Originally posted by Mr. Brownstone
http://homepage.mac.com/gapodaca/dig...ini/index.html
http://homepage.mac.com/gapodaca/dig...nde/index.html
I’ve known girls far prettier in good ol’ RL™ than any of these magazine bints. :sour:
Of course, that's just my opinion. I could be wrong.
Nice thread![]()
which is the original?Originally posted by Happy_Hamburger
[IMG] http://www.fh-worms.de/~inf650/pics/photoshop.jpg[/IMG]
I dont know why people wank over magazines like FHM or Maxim, they are really masterbating over graphic wizardy
![]()
The flowers were edited out, so... you decide.Originally posted by Plumb_Drumb
which is the original?
![]()
Cool, but does it matter?
If she's a pic online, then she automatically isn't "real".
You're never going to tough her boobies, so it doesn't matter if they're photoshopped or full of silicone or her bra is stuffed with newspaper or she's Lara Croft.
She's just pixels and your imagination. If it does the job for you then.... yuck, I dont want to know the details.![]()
Bookmarks